“Jesus was a woman,” are words that, although I don’t agree
with, I could still read with open mind. But to read that Jesus was a “hermaphrodite,”
is beyond belief!
Dr. Susannah Cornwall, a professor at Manchester University 's
Lincoln Theological Institute, wrote in a recent paper that the idea that Jesus
was male is "simply a best guess."
In her paper, titled "Intersex & Ontology, A Response to The Church, Women Bishops and Provision," she states that it is impossible to know "with any certainty" that Jesus did not have both male and female organs.
On her blog,Cornwall
notes that, "About 1 in every 2,500 people is born with an intersex
condition which means that their body varies from the typical male or female
pattern. It's therefore possible that Jesus – in common with many other people
whose sex is never called in question – had a hidden or 'invisible' intersex
condition."
She goes on to note in her paper that because of this, "It is not possible to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was male as we now define maleness. There is no way of knowing for sure that Jesus did not have one of the intersex conditions."
Cornwall also
argues that because Jesus is not known to have had children, this also makes
his gender status "even more uncertain."
In her paper, titled "Intersex & Ontology, A Response to The Church, Women Bishops and Provision," she states that it is impossible to know "with any certainty" that Jesus did not have both male and female organs.
On her blog,
She goes on to note in her paper that because of this, "It is not possible to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was male as we now define maleness. There is no way of knowing for sure that Jesus did not have one of the intersex conditions."
Okay then, let’s see if there is confusion in the bible
about the gender of Jesus. Six hundred years before the birth of Christ, Isaiah
(9:6) prophesied these words: “For to us a child is
born” (could be male, could be female), “to us a
SON is given” (bingo!).
Now let’s move from centuries before the birth of Christ to
the actual birth itself.
In Matthew 1:18, we read, “Mary had
been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found with child”
(could be either a male or female) “by the Holy Spirit.”
An angel then appears to Joseph to assure him that even though Mary is pregnant
with a child that is not personally his, he should take Mary as his wife
because God had miraculously blessed her with this child. The angel then tells
Joseph the following (Matt. 1:21): “And she shall bear
a SON” (bingo!)
Remember how mad Herod was over the news that Jesus was
born? He thought that his throne was in jeopardy because a king had been born
to take his place. So Herod went on a killing spree. This is what we read: “When Herod saw that he had been tricked by the magi, he
became very enraged and sent and slew all the MALE” (Bingo!) “children who were born in Bethlehem ” (Matt. 2:16). It seemed pretty obvious to Herod what Jesus’
gender was.
At the age of 30 when Jesus was baptized by John the
Baptist, God the Father spoke from heaven these words: “This
is My beloved SON. . .” (Matt. 3:17). God knew what Jesus was BEFORE His
birth (remember Isaiah’s prophecy?) He obviously knows what Jesus was when He
was at the age of 30.
But what about the parents of Jesus – Joseph and Mary?
Shouldn’t they know? We read in Luke 2:21, “And when
the eight days were completed before His CIRCUMCISION. . .” The parents of Jesus had him circumcised.
Certainly that would be a strong clue that Jesus was indeed male.
But what about after Jesus’ death and resurrection? Maybe there was some confusion on the part of
the New Testament writers. Paul, who wrote 13 of the 27 books found in the New
Testament, said this: “For there is one God, and one
mediator between God and men, the MAN Christ Jesus” (1 Tim. 2:5).
So now I find myself in a personal dilemma. When I read the
bible, I read where God, an angel, Jesus' parents, Herod, and Paul, all affirm
that Jesus was born a male. But then there is this scholar who says that since
Jesus did not have any kids of his own, that is a strong clue he could have
been born a hermaphrodite.
Whew! This is going to be a tough choice to decide. I may
have to take a day off from canoe practice in order to ponder this decision. I
hope you won’t have to go through the struggling of not knowing Jesus’ true
gender, as I am faced with. The evidence on the side of Jesus being a
hermaphrodite is so strong and staggering. My faith is being tested! And it is
even more compelling because it was written by a university professor.
Oh, I am also reminded of one more piece of evidence that
may (I use the word “may” because of the source) indicate Jesus’ true gender.
Over in Mark, Jesus travels to the country of the Gerasenes and He encounters a
man who living among the tombs. Within this man were many demons. So when Jesus
approached this man, the demon (main spokesperson on behalf of the other demons)
within him spoke these words, “What do I have to do
with You, Jesus, SON of the Most High God” (Mark 5:7). In this one statement,
these demons understood the following:
1. Jesus
actually existed as a person – “What to I have to do with you”
2. His
name – “Jesus”
3. His
gender – “Son”
4. His
origin – “Most High God”
Could it be, that evil, depraved, dirty, sinful, rotten,
vile, corrupt, hell-bound demons know more about Jesus' gender than Dr. Susannah Cornwall, a
university professor?
But I did in the beginning use the word “may” as proof of
Jesus’ gender. Because after all, we all know that demons lie! J
No comments:
Post a Comment